State-owned enterprises • 2015

Čeps, a.s.

IČO 25702556

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. Buyer profile has high number of errors.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

37%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
V410 zdvojení vedení, realizace
Demolice a zemní práce
4
Ø4 in industry
TR Čechy střed Istavebně - montážní práce - dodatek č. 1
Demolice a zemní práce
1
Ø4 in industry
Čechy střed I, stavebně - montážní práce
Demolice a zemní práce
5
Ø4 in industry
TR Mírovka - Mírovka I, stavebně-montážní práce - Dodatek 2
Demolice a zemní práce
1
Ø4 in industry
TR Mírovka - Mírovka I, stavebně-montážní práce - Dodatek 3
Demolice a zemní práce
1
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

55%
average 62%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Egem s.r.o.
26 7,547,752,254
Sag Elektrovod, a.s. organizační složka Brno
17 4,893,135,872
Ase, s.r.o.
25 2,469,863,067
Omexom Ga Energo s.r.o.
2 2,271,944,390
TAMINI TRASFORMATORI srl
0 727,599,000
Other suppliers 46 3,930,924,689

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 78%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

77%
average 67%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 28,138,241,082
Unregulated purchases 19,239,027,418
Total 47,377,268,500

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

35%
average 73%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

43%
average 59%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 31%
Cancelled contracts 17%
Average requirements modifications count 0.17

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

48%
average 76%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 2% (3 from 120)
Final or estimated price not published 30% (36 from 120)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 120)
Missing supplier ID 4% (5 from 120)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 120)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 120)
Call and award notices contradict each other 1% (1 from 120)
Missing call for tenders 35% (42 from 120)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

2%
average 36%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 3% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.10 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

85%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 120)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 120)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 120)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 120)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 120)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 120)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 16% (19 from 120)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

50%
average 29%

Conditional disclosure

Buyer responded within 15 days legal limit.