State-owned enterprises • 2015

Revmatologický Ústav

IČO 00023728

Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms. Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

26%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Nákup léků pro lékárnu RÚ - biologické léky III
Léčivé přípravky a zdravotnické prostředky
2
Ø3 in industry
Zajištění dodávek hotových jídel pro dietní stravování pacientů lůžkového oddělení a závodního stravování zaměstnanců RÚ
Příprava jídel
3
Ø2 in industry
Skiagrafický RTG přístroj s přímou digitalizací a lineární tomografií
Rentgenové přístroje
3
Ø2 in industry
Pořízení biochemického analyzátoru a průběžné dodávky reagencií
Imunoanalytické přístroje
2
Ø2 in industry
Nákup léků pro lékárnu RÚ - léčivé přípravky pro léčbu osteoporózy I
Léčivé přípravky a zdravotnické prostředky
3
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

8%
average 62%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Phoenix lékárenský velkoobchod, a.s.
1 192,000,000
Eurest, spol. s r.o.
1 12,000,000
Promedica Praha Group, a.s.
1 5,700,750
Beckman Coulter Česká republika s.r.o.
1 5,500,000
Viapharma s.r.o.
1 4,500,000
Other suppliers 4 8,832,380

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 78%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

43%
average 67%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 228,533,130
Unregulated purchases 990,828,081
Total 1,219,361,211

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

98%
average 73%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Nákup léků pro lékárnu RÚ - Tracleer
Not disclosed
1,000,000
Dodávka léků – Orencia 250 mg INF PLV CSL
Not disclosed
Not disclosed

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

75%
average 59%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 4%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

57%
average 76%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 10% (1 from 10)
Final or estimated price not published 50% (5 from 10)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 10)
Missing supplier ID 20% (2 from 10)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 10)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 10)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 10)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 10)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

45%
average 36%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 57% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.88 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

100%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 10)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 10% (1 from 10)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 29%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.