Government • 2015

Centrum pro regionální rozvoj Čr

IČO 65993870

Good buyer. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Competitions are open to multiple bidders.

5.
ranking
75%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

66%
average 61%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Technická podpora systémové infrastruktury pro Monitorovací systémy SF7+
Systémové a podpůrné služby
3
Ø1 in industry
Obnova serverové infrastruktury a datové úložiště
Počítačové sítě
2
Ø3 in industry
Náhrada aktivních prvků a příprava bezpečnostní infrastruktury na IPv6
Síťové routery
3
Ø4 in industry
Prodloužení podpory k licencím pro systém řízení báze dat
Podpora programového vybavení
4
Ø1 in industry
Podpory a licence pro systémovou infrastrukturu II
Podpora programového vybavení
5
Ø1 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

75%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Tesco Sw a.s.
2 20,503,880
Your System, spol.s r.o.
3 15,152,906
C System Cz a.s.
1 10,945,203
Ness Czech s.r.o.
2 10,252,100
Softwareone Czech Republic s.r.o.
2 6,863,915
Other suppliers 15 22,268,982

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (1 from 0)
Nonprice competition 57% (4 from 7)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 7)
E-auction 0% (0 from 7)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 7)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

65%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 85,986,987
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 115,461,313
Total 201,448,300

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

73%
average 61%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Prodloužení podpory k licencím pro databázové servery pro rok 2013
Krajní naléhavost
- 3,360,000
Dodání průběžné služby rozvoje Mapového serveru CRR ČR na roky 2013 - 2015
Not disclosed
- 3,103,000

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

52%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 8%
Cancelled contracts 27%
Average requirements modifications count 0.42

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

65%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 4% (1 from 25)
Final or estimated price not published 4% (1 from 25)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 25)
Missing supplier ID 4% (1 from 25)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 25)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 25)
Missing call for tenders 4% (1 from 25)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 25)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 25)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

73%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 83% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.51 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

89%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 25)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 25)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 8% (2 from 25)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 25)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 25)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 25)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 20% (5 from 25)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

100%
average 56%

Full disclosure

Buyer responded within 15 days legal limit.