State-owned enterprises • 2015

Hamzova odborná léčebna pro děti a dospělé

IČO 00183024

Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure. Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability.

14.
ranking
73%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

66%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Stavební úpravy pavilonu I (1.etapa, výtah, dokončení)
Stavební úpravy objektů sloužících pro zdravotní péči
6
Ø4 in industry
Léčiva 2014/2015 (2)
Léčivé přípravky a zdravotnické prostředky
1
Ø3 in industry
Stavební úpravy pavilonu C pro LOOP
Stavební úpravy objektů sloužících pro zdravotní péči
4
Ø4 in industry
Dodávka zemního plynu vč.sdružených služeb v roce 2012
Zemní plyn
5
Ø3 in industry
Dokončení modernizace prádelenské technologie v HL Luže – Košumberk
Stroje pro praní, čištění a sušení prádla
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

71%
average 62%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
První Stavební Chrudim a.s.
1 21,217,571
Pragoperun, spol. s r.o.
2 13,553,500
Violka Luže s.r.o.
1 8,180,062
Marhold a.s.
1 6,895,000
Pragoplyn, a.s.
1 6,466,602
Other suppliers 7 17,108,745

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

92%
average 78%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

56%
average 67%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 77,741,481
Unregulated purchases 173,939,765
Total 251,681,246

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 73%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 59%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

96%
average 76%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 13)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 13)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 13)
Missing supplier ID 8% (1 from 13)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 13)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 13)
Call and award notices contradict each other 8% (1 from 13)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 13)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 36%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 0% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.00 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

90%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 13)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier bankruptcy 8% (1 from 13)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 15% (2 from 13)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 29%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.