Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Kraslice

IČO 00259438

Good buyer. Enough firms are competing for contracts. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality.

7.
ranking
79%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

74%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
DODÁVKY PLYNU PRO MĚSTO KRASLICE OD 1. 1. 2015 DO 1. 1. 2018
Zemní plyn
6
Ø5 in industry
Kraslice - bezbariérové komunikace pro pěší
Stavební úpravy chodníků
10
Ø6 in industry
Kraslice – stavební úpravy kulturního domu IV. etapa
Stavební úpravy budov sloužících pro volný čas, sporty, kulturu, ubytování a restaurace
5
Ø4 in industry
Město Kraslice – nákup zemního plynu v období od 1.1.2018 do 1. 1. 2021
Zemní plyn
3
Ø5 in industry
Dětská hřiště a zahrady v přírodním stylu ve městě Kraslice
Vybavení hřišť
4
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

64%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
CONTE spol. s r.o.
2 18,530,000
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o.
1 9,297,319
Stavební společnost VARO, s.r.o.
1 9,059,622
COLAS CZ, a.s.
1 6,942,982
PE-REZA, spol. s r.o.
1 3,333,298
Other suppliers 5 6,422,643

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (1 from 3)
Nonprice competition 33% (1 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

64%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 90,791,905
Unregulated purchases 129,342,602
Total 220,134,507

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

84%
average 91%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Technické řešení bezpečnosti ZŠ a MŠ města Kraslice
Outside directive scope
2,224,982
Dodatečné stavební práce při obnově dopravní infrastruktury města Kraslice – I. Etapa
Additional works
113,161

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.33

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

91%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 10)
Final or estimated price not published 30% (3 from 10)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 10)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 10)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 10)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 10)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 10)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 10)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

62%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 90% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.10 (average mistakes per contract)