Government • 2015

Státní ústav pro kontrolu léčiv

IČO 00023817

Buyer profile has high number of errors. Enough firms are competing for contracts.

29.
ranking
67%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

86%
average 61%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

67%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Tronevia a.s.
6 68,599,592
Ders Group s.r.o.
2 21,964,875
Oksystem a.s.
4 12,410,450
Domistav Cz a.s.
1 9,129,783
Ict Energo, s.r.o.
2 7,388,480
Other suppliers 22 56,555,477

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (7 from 0)
Nonprice competition 15% (4 from 26)
Division into lots 8% (2 from 26)
E-auction 0% (0 from 26)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 26)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

54%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 176,048,658
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 427,075,040
Total 603,123,698

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

58%
average 61%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
JŘBU02/2014 - „Poskytování služeb technické podpory provozu vybraných systémů SÚKL“
Jediný dodavatel (právní důvody)
- 20,599,992
Jednací řízení bez uveřejnění č. 53/2012 "Konsolidace dat pro potřeby reportingu z oblasti LEK13 a DIS13"
Not disclosed
- 1,616,500
Jednací řízení bez uveřejnění č. 05/2013 "Servisní smlouva o poskytnutí služeb technické podpory""
Jediný dodavatel (právní důvody)
- 80,000

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

49%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 9%
Cancelled contracts 33%
Average requirements modifications count 0.47

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

80%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 13% (5 from 39)
Final or estimated price not published 21% (8 from 39)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 39)
Missing supplier ID 3% (1 from 39)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 39)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 39)
Missing call for tenders 10% (4 from 39)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 39)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 39)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

6%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 8% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.18 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

70%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 13% (5 from 39)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 5% (2 from 39)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 39)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 39)
Supplier bankruptcy 3% (1 from 39)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 39)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 21% (8 from 39)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

100%
average 56%

Full disclosure

Buyer responded within 15 days legal limit.