Government • 2015

Ministerstvo financí

IČO 00006947

Large volume of money is spent without open competition. Lot of money goes into historical contracts and unregulated purchases.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

61%
average 61%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

92%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Ibm Česká republika, spol. s r.o.
9 419,284,475
Awt Rekultivace a.s.
6 317,397,068
Kr Ostrava a.s.
2 305,579,429
Ekora s.r.o.
3 259,677,009
O2 Czech Republic a.s.
10 231,642,605
Other suppliers 176 2,955,892,975

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 48% (29 from 61)
Nonprice competition 23% (14 from 61)
Lots 5% (3 from 61)
E-auction 0% (0 from 61)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

12%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 4,578,256,563
Unregulated purchases 339,212,865,534
Total 343,791,122,097

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

14%
average 61%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

68%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 5%
Cancelled contracts 18%
Average requirements modifications count 0.38

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

55%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 209)
Final or estimated price not published 23% (49 from 209)
Procedure type not published 0% (1 from 209)
Missing supplier ID 2% (4 from 209)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 209)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 209)
Call and award notices contradict each other 1% (3 from 209)
Missing call for tenders 8% (16 from 209)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

53%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 76% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.21 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

86%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 209)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (1 from 209)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 5% (10 from 209)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 209)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 209)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (1 from 209)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 14% (29 from 209)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

75%
average 56%

Full disclosure

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.