Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Velká Bíteš

IČO 00295647

Small number of firms recieve most of contracts. Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

15%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
„Inženýrské sítě na Babinci – 2. etapa“
Práce pro kompletní nebo částečnou výstavbu inženýrské stavitelství
4
Ø6 in industry
„Inženýrské sítě na Babinci – 1. etapa“
Práce pro kompletní nebo částečnou výstavbu inženýrské stavitelství
2
Ø6 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti budovy Základní školy Velká Bíteš p. o. na ul. Sadová č. p. 579 ve Velké Bíteši
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

8%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
IMOS Brno, a.s.
2 53,958,494
KROS – stav, a.s.
2 11,352,938
Kros STAV a.s.
1 59,065

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 3)
Nonprice competition 33% (1 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

50%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 108,604,137
Unregulated purchases 322,455,141
Total 431,059,278

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

91%
average 91%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

67%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 33%
Average requirements modifications count 3.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

95%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 6)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 6)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 6)
Missing supplier ID 17% (1 from 6)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 6)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 6)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 6)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 6)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 40% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.80 (average mistakes per contract)