State-owned enterprises • 2015

Český metrologický institut

IČO 00177016

Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. The supplier portfolio is relatively broad.

17.
ranking
72%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

52%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rámcová smlouva na operativní leasing vozidel pro ČMI - 2
Finanční služby
2
Ø4 in industry
Přístavba Pardubice - 2
Stavební práce
8
Ø5 in industry
Dodávka letenek a služeb souvisejících.
Služby cestovních agentur, tour operátorů a pomoc turistům
6
Ø2 in industry
Výpočetní systém se sdílenou pamětí a vysokým výkonem - 2
Superpočítače
5
Ø2 in industry
Plynový chromatograf
Plynové chromatografy
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

81%
average 62%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Čsob Leasing, a.s.
1 40,000,000
Chládek a Tintěra, Pardubice a.s.
1 32,873,875
Unknown name
0 13,667,984
Thomas Cook s.r.o.
1 10,000,000
M Computers s.r.o.
1 9,044,474
Other suppliers 26 79,045,543

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

67%
average 67%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 184,631,879
Unregulated purchases 226,000,976
Total 410,632,855

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

80%
average 73%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Dodávková vozidla se speciálními nástavbami a EMS pro ověřování výdejních stojanů PH - IV
Not disclosed
3,151,652
Dodávková vozidla se speciálními nástavbami - II
Not disclosed
2,506,610
Výkonový vysokofrekvenční zesilovač - II
Not disclosed
1,823,595
Vakuové napařovací zařízení
Not disclosed
1,420,000
Spektrální analyzátor - II
Not disclosed
1,044,632

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

53%
average 59%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 42%
Average requirements modifications count 0.26

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

90%
average 76%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 34)
Final or estimated price not published 3% (1 from 34)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 34)
Missing supplier ID 26% (9 from 34)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 34)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 34)
Call and award notices contradict each other 6% (2 from 34)
Missing call for tenders 3% (1 from 34)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

66%
average 36%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 85% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.89 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

97%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 34)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 34)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 34)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 34)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 34)
Supplier donating to political party 3% (1 from 34)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 12% (4 from 34)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 29%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.