Hospitals • 2015

Masarykův onkologický ústav

IČO 00209805

Good buyer. Buyer profile has high number of errors. Buyer does not avoid following procurement law.

4.
ranking
74%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

74%
average 57%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Fludeoxyglukosa-(18F)
Radioaktivní materiály
Not disclosed
Ø4 in industry
Ozařovna pro LU IV a V
Stavební práce
2
Ø5 in industry
Biologická léčba 2013 - injekční / infuzní roztok
Léčivé přípravky a zdravotnické prostředky
5
Ø3 in industry
Biologická léčba 2014 – injekční / infuzní roztok
Léčivé přípravky a zdravotnické prostředky
4
Ø3 in industry
RECAMO – Education/Learning Unit – stavební úpravy 6. NP stávajícího objektu Švejdova pavilonu
Stavební úpravy objektů sloužících pro zdravotní péči
10
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

86%
average 69%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Phoenix lékárenský velkoobchod, a.s.
26 230,154,613
Alliance Healthcare s.r.o.
18 197,676,749
Újv Řež, a. s.
1 130,000,000
D-pharm, a.s.
5 88,599,221
Rent-pharm,a.s.
6 88,157,585
Other suppliers 85 733,669,363

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

94%
average 82%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (13 from 0)
Nonprice competition 13% (12 from 91)
Division into lots 74% (67 from 91)
E-auction 95% (86 from 91)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 91)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

75%
average 45%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 1,581,434,952
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 1,245,019,548
Total 2,826,454,500

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

90%
average 78%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Servisní služby pro lineární urychlovače
Not disclosed
- 10,000,000
Upgade verifikačního a plánovacího systému radioterapie MOÚ
Not disclosed
- 8,850,000
RELICEO – EIZ I
Not disclosed
- 6,673,706
Podpora provozu vybraných informačních systémů v rámci lékárenského systému PANAKEA
Not disclosed
- 5,200,000
Upgrade řídících kabinetů lineárních urychlovačů
Not disclosed
- 2,900,000

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

55%
average 53%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 10%
Cancelled contracts 19%
Average requirements modifications count 0.82

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

83%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 7% (10 from 142)
Final or estimated price not published 11% (15 from 142)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 142)
Missing supplier ID 1% (1 from 142)
Missing buyer ID 1% (2 from 142)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 142)
Missing call for tenders 13% (18 from 142)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 142)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 142)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

1%
average 45%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 1% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.62 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

89%
average 89%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 142)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 1% (1 from 142)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 142)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 142)
Supplier bankruptcy 1% (2 from 142)
Supplier donating to political party 4% (5 from 142)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 13% (19 from 142)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

50%
average 33%

Conditional disclosure

Buyer responded within 15 days legal limit.