Hospitals • 2015

Oblastní nemocnice Kolín, a.s., nemocnice Středočeského kraje

IČO 27256391

There are not many contract extensions and ammendments. Small number of firms recieve most of contracts.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 57%
Largest contracts
Technologie pro objekt SO 04 - Pavilon N – Oblastní nemocnice Kolín, a. s.
Zdravotnické přístroje
Ø2 in industry
"Rekonstrukce objektu SO.03 - pavilon "O" - v Oblastní nemocnici Kolín, a.s., nemocnici Středočeského kraje“
Výstavba nemocničních zařízení
Ø3 in industry
Poskytování úklidových prací a služeb
Úklidové služby
Ø8 in industry
Technologie pro Pavilon D – Dětské oddělení Oblastní nemocnice Kolín, a. s.
Zdravotnické přístroje
Ø2 in industry
Skiagraficko-skiaskopický komplet s přímou digitalizací
Zdravotnické přístroje
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 69%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Hospimed, spol. s r.o.
2 156,083,670
Metrostav a.s.
1 98,493,153
Gsus absolutní čistota a.s.
1 57,600,000
Chironax Estral spol. s r. o.
1 14,268,900
Edomed a.s.
1 10,328,000
Other suppliers 23 49,259,448

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 45%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 386,033,172
Unregulated purchases 3,495,862,828
Total 3,881,896,000

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 78%
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Oblastní nemocnice Kolín a.s., nemocnice SČK – technologické vybavení Iktového centra - Multidetektorový CT přístroj – upgrade
Not disclosed

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 53%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 6%
Cancelled contracts 14%
Average requirements modifications count 1.25

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 29)
Final or estimated price not published 3% (1 from 29)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 29)
Missing supplier ID 14% (4 from 29)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 29)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 29)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 29)
Missing call for tenders 10% (3 from 29)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 45%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 40% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.54 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

average 89%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 3% (1 from 29)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 29)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 29)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 29)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 29)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 29)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 17% (5 from 29)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

average 33%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.