Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Telč

IČO 00286745

Good buyer. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure. Small number of firms does not recieve majority of contracts.

27.
ranking
75%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

51%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce a odbahnění rybníka Štěpnický v Telči

6
Ø7 in industry
Rekonstrukce ulice Tyršova, Mládkova, Nám. Hrdinů

8
Ø7 in industry
Výstavba kanalizace a vodovodu v ul. Mládkova, Tyršova a nám. Hrdinů v Telči

15
Ø7 in industry
Cyklostezka Telč - Lipky
Cycle path construction work
6
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce střechy a krovu věže Sv. Ducha v Telči
Roof repair and maintenance work
1
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

70%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
VHS Bohemia a.s.
1 24,860,133
TOMIreko, s.r.o.
1 11,704,398
Radouňská vodohospodářská společnost, a.s.
1 11,399,570
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
1 9,484,659
H & B delta, s.r.o.
1 7,232,605
Other suppliers 10 18,704,969

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 4)
Nonprice competition 25% (1 from 4)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 4)
E-auction 0% (0 from 4)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 4)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

55%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 151,073,098
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 348,272,351
Total 499,345,448

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.25

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 13)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 13)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 13)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 13)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 13)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 13)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 13)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 13)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 13)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

48%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 62% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.54 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 13 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders