Small cities • 2016

Město Nejdek

IČO 00254801

Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms. Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids.

108.
ranking
73%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

38%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Komunální a technické služby pro město Nejdek
Služby související s likvidací odpadů a odpady
2
Ø3 in industry
Zlepšení vodohospodářské infrastruktury Města Nejdku
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
6
Ø5 in industry
„Realizace úspor energií – ZŠ nám. Karla IV., Nejdek“
Stavební úpravy školních budov
7
Ø5 in industry
„Realizace úspor energií – ZŠ Karlovarská, Nejdek“
Stavební úpravy školních budov
7
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

24%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Ave Cz odpadové hospodářství s.r.o.
1 419,641,200
Vodohospodářské stavby, společnost s ručením omezeným
1 254,804,368
morez stavební s.r.o.
1 7,493,501
Isso - Inženýrské stavby Sokolov, s. r. o.
1 3,018,179

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 100% (1 from 1)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 50%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

98%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 4)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 4)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 4)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 4)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 4)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 4)
Missing call for tenders 50% (2 from 4)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 4)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 4)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

100%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 4)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 4)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 4)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 4)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 4)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 4)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 0% (0 from 4)