Small cities • 2016

Město Kunovice

IČO 00567892

Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids. The supplier portfolio is relatively broad.

129.
ranking
72%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

35%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Areál Jízdy králů Kunovice
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Zlepšení energetické náročnosti víceúčelové haly Kunovice
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
"Zateplení objektu MŠ Mládežnická v Kunovicích u Uh. Hradiště"
Stavební úpravy školních budov
3
Ø5 in industry
Dodávky tepla pro město Kunovice
Dodávky a rozvod jiných zdrojů energie
10
Ø1 in industry
Údržba travnatých ploch – Kunovice
Služby při údržbě pozemků
4
Ø6 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

68%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Berger Bohemia a. s.
1 13,998,770
Papp, spol. s r. o.
1 12,478,784
Odpady-třídění-recyklace a.s.
1 11,318,583
Cgm Morava s.r.o.
1 9,541,999
Reúss Energetika a.s.
1 4,990,000
Other suppliers 4 7,180,773

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Lots 33% (1 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

83%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.67

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

92%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 9)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 9)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 9)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 9)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 9)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 9)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 9)
Missing call for tenders 11% (1 from 9)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

79%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 11% (1 from 9)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 9)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier donating to political party 11% (1 from 9)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 11% (1 from 9)