State-owned enterprises • 2015

Technické služby Opava s. r. o.

IČO 64618188

There are not many contract extensions and ammendments. Buyer profile has high number of errors.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

26%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
"Lis pro separační linku odpadu TSO"
Různá strojní zařízení pro všeobecné účely a speciální strojní zařízení
1
Ø2 in industry
Rozšíření odděleného sběru odpadu ve městě Opava
Vozidla pro svoz odpadků a odpadních vod
2
Ø3 in industry
Rozšíření odděleného sběru odpadu ve městě Opava
Vozidla pro sběr odpadků
2
Ø3 in industry
Dodávka vozidla pro svoz směsného odpadu
Vozidla pro sběr odpadků
3
Ø3 in industry
Vybudování SSZ Opava-Komárov
Instalace a montáž zařízení pro řízení provozu
3
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

70%
average 62%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Croy s.r.o.
2 8,295,326
A-tec servis s.r.o.
2 8,051,000
Fornal trading s.r.o.
2 8,000,500
Ekoprav, s.r.o.
1 4,588,719
Patriot, spol. s r. o.
1 3,430,367
Other suppliers 10 7,163,684

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 2)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)
Inovativni 0% ( from 2)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

53%
average 67%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 57,401,997
Zakazky maleho rozsahu 0
Unregulated purchases 148,601,779
Total 206,003,776

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 73%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 25%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

77%
average 76%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 21)
Final or estimated price not published 76% (16 from 21)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 21)
Missing supplier ID 10% (2 from 21)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 21)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 21)
Missing call for tenders 10% (2 from 21)
Zakazka nema viteznou cenu 0% ( from 21)
Cena byla aktualizovana 0% ( from 21)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

9%
average 36%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 11% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.81 (average mistakes per contract)
Uveřejňují se na profilu zakázky malého rozsahu? (Poměřujeme proti počtu zakázek v režimu zákona)
0-250K 0 zakázek
250K-500K 0 zakázek
500K-1000K 0 zakázek
1000K+ 0 zakázek

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

91%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 21)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 21)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 21)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 21)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 21)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 21)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 29% (6 from 21)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

100%
average 29%

Full disclosure

Buyer responded within 15 days legal limit.