State-owned enterprises • 2015

Sdružené zdravotnické zařízení Krnov, příspěvková organizace

IČO 00844641

Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. Uncompetitive procedures are overused.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

39%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce stravovacího provozu – dodávka technologického zařízení
Instalace a montáž vybavených kuchyní
3
Ø5 in industry
Přístrojové vybavení iktového centra Sdruženého zdravotnického zařízení Krnov
Zdravotnické přístroje
3
Ø2 in industry
SZZ Krnov - úpravy stravovacího provozu
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Nákup mobilního skiaskopického přístroje s C- ramenem
Diagnostický rentgenový systém
2
Ø2 in industry
Zateplení stravovacího zařízení a energobloku SZZ Krnov
Tepelné izolace
2
Ø6 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

61%
average 62%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Stargen Eu s.r.o.
1 19,425,750
Rakord - R & R, spol. s r.o.
4 17,875,096
Audioscan, spol. s r.o.
1 14,997,000
Aura Medical s.r.o.
1 5,290,000
Chironax Frýdek - Místek s.r.o.
2 4,408,000
Other suppliers 6 5,319,210

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (1 from 2)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Lots 50% (1 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

26%
average 67%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 67,315,056
Unregulated purchases 901,353,444
Total 968,668,500

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

26%
average 73%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Rekonstrukce stravovacího provozu – dodávka technologického zařízení
Not disclosed
19,425,750

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

40%
average 59%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 67%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

90%
average 76%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 15)
Final or estimated price not published 13% (2 from 15)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 15)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 15)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 15)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 15)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 15)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 15)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

96%
average 36%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.16 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

75%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 15)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 15)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 15)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 15)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 15)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 15)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 53% (8 from 15)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 29%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.