Hospitals • 2015

Fakultní nemocnice v Motole

IČO 00064203

Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. The competition for contracts is low.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

35%
average 57%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

71%
average 69%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Metrostav a.s.
5 558,881,087
Audioscan, spol. s r.o.
9 91,070,800
Kooperativa pojišťovna, a.s., Vienna Insurance Group
2 79,908,197
Starkon a.s.
2 50,555,195
B. Braun Medical s.r.o.
10 38,262,886
Other suppliers 165 647,359,524

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

94%
average 82%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (14 from 0)
Nonprice competition 10% (6 from 62)
Division into lots 37% (23 from 62)
E-auction 66% (41 from 62)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 62)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

36%
average 45%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 1,539,189,379
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 10,443,690,121
Total 11,982,879,500

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

68%
average 78%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Dodatek č. 1 ke Smlouvě o sdružených službách dodávky elektřiny
Předchozí zakázka bez nabídek, Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody)
- 27,000,000
Dodatek č. 1 smlouvy o sdružených službách dodávky a odběru zemního plynu
Předchozí zakázka bez nabídek, Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody)
- 26,500,000
FN Motol - kochleární implantáty II.
Not disclosed
- 26,174,448
FN Motol - zajištění servisu, oprav, údržby a preventivních prohlídek dvourovinného angiografického kompletu INFINIX CF - i/BP firmy TOSHIBA
Not disclosed
- 11,644,800
FN Motol - modernizace dvou RTG zařízení
Not disclosed
- 7,860,000

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

39%
average 53%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 17%
Cancelled contracts 38%
Average requirements modifications count 0.64

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

79%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 1% (2 from 193)
Final or estimated price not published 2% (3 from 193)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 193)
Missing supplier ID 7% (14 from 193)
Missing buyer ID 1% (1 from 193)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 193)
Missing call for tenders 16% (30 from 193)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 193)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 193)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

74%
average 45%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 81% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.36 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

95%
average 89%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 193)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 1% (2 from 193)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 1% (1 from 193)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 193)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 193)
Supplier donating to political party 1% (1 from 193)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 20% (38 from 193)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

25%
average 33%

Conditional disclosure

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.