State-owned enterprises • 2015

Správa Národního parku Šumava

IČO 00583171

Good buyer. Buyer does not avoid following procurement law. The competition for contracts is high.

5.
ranking
76%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

85%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Návštěvnické centrum Srní
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Návštěvnické centrum Kvilda
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Usměrňování cyklistické dopravy v NP Šumava II - Cyklostezka Gerlova Huť - Nová Hůrka - Prášily - Srní; úsek II/A Nová Hůrka - Skelná
Výstavba cyklistických stezek
9
Ø5 in industry
Stanice SDH parc. č. 1050/1, st.p.č. 216/4, kat. území Stožec
Stavební úpravy objektů používaných pořádkovými nebo pohotovostními službami a vojenských budov
5
Ø5 in industry
Soužití člověka a perlorodky říční ve Vltavském luhu
Poradenské služby související s otázkami životního prostředí
2
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

77%
average 62%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Ekologická Stavební Králův Dvůr s.r.o.
1 69,249,423
Auböck s.r.o.
1 59,488,489
Colas Cz, a.s.
1 18,769,154
Protom Strakonice, s.r.o.
1 14,235,130
" M plus " spol. s r.o.
3 10,318,055
Other suppliers 308 113,643,545

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 78%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

100%
average 67%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 1,148,200,717
Unregulated purchases 0
Total 1,148,200,717

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

98%
average 73%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

53%
average 59%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 4%
Cancelled contracts 3%
Average requirements modifications count 0.47

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

79%
average 76%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 315)
Final or estimated price not published 36% (114 from 315)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 315)
Missing supplier ID 1% (2 from 315)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 315)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 315)
Call and award notices contradict each other 27% (85 from 315)
Missing call for tenders 3% (9 from 315)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

6%
average 36%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 7% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.40 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

85%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 2% (7 from 315)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 315)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (1 from 315)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 315)
Supplier bankruptcy 4% (12 from 315)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 315)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 4% (12 from 315)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

75%
average 29%

Partial disclosure

Buyer responded within 15 days legal limit.