Hospitals • 2015

Centrum Kardiovaskulární A Transplantační Chirurgie

IČO 00209775

Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled. Often makes mistakes in procurement journal announcements.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

65%
average 57%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Dodávka angiografické linky II
Zdravotnické přístroje
3
Ø2 in industry
Zajištění servisních služeb zdravotnické techniky Philips
Opravy a údržba zdravotnických a přesných přístrojů
1
Ø1 in industry
Oxygenátory
Jednotka pro mimotělní oběh
3
Ø3 in industry
Echokardiografický přístroj
Echografické, ultrazvukové a Dopplerovy zobrazovací přístroje
2
Ø2 in industry
Srdeční chlopně
Srdeční chlopeň
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

68%
average 69%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Biomedica Čs, s.r.o.
6 21,662,000
S & T Plus s.r.o.
2 18,629,092
Siemens, s.r.o.
2 17,122,034
Hebios, s.r.o.
4 9,839,500
Cardion s.r.o.
3 3,586,460
Other suppliers 8 13,825,688

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 82%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 4)
Nonprice competition 100% (4 from 4)
Lots 100% (4 from 4)
E-auction 100% (4 from 4)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

30%
average 45%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 84,664,774
Unregulated purchases 852,427,226
Total 937,092,000

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

42%
average 78%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Zajištění servisních služeb zdravotnické techniky Philips
Not disclosed
15,249,092
1389: Fluoroanalyzátor 3
Not disclosed
1,161,000

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

13%
average 53%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 63%
Cancelled contracts 28%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

46%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 25)
Final or estimated price not published 8% (2 from 25)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 25)
Missing supplier ID 4% (1 from 25)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 25)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 25)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 25)
Missing call for tenders 40% (10 from 25)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

28%
average 45%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 34% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.73 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

97%
average 89%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 25)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 25)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 25)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 25)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 25)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 25)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 16% (4 from 25)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

25%
average 33%

Conditional disclosure

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.