State-owned enterprises • 2015

Čepro, a.s.

IČO 60193531

Good buyer. The competition for contracts is high. Buyer does not avoid following procurement law.

1.
ranking
88%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

81%
average 52%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

75%
average 62%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Unipetrol Rpa, s.r.o.
11 39,543,787,619
Mol Česká republika, s.r.o.
6 37,827,380,952
Mol čerpací stanice, s.r.o.
3 29,166,666,666
Preol, a.s.
11 16,773,349,800
P3chem s.r.o.
12 9,140,751,576
Other suppliers 115 49,050,313,287

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

92%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 19% (15 from 80)
Nonprice competition 20% (16 from 80)
Lots 85% (68 from 80)
E-auction 12% (10 from 80)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

94%
average 67%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 182,319,773,299
Unregulated purchases 24,254,893,701
Total 206,574,667,000

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

96%
average 73%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Krizové dodávky Preblendu BA 95 a motorové nafty - prosinec 2012_11122012
Krajní naléhavost
189,480,000
Krizové dodávky biosložek kvasného lihu obecně denaturovaného - leden 2013_01012013
Krajní naléhavost
150,300,000
Krizové dodávky motorové nafty - prosinec 2012_07122012
Krajní naléhavost
116,528,940
Krizové dodávky motorové nafty - listopad 2012_05112012
Krajní naléhavost
106,925,346
Krizové dodávky motorové nafty – prosinec 2012_03122012
Krajní naléhavost
99,524,324

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

82%
average 59%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 5%
Cancelled contracts 3%
Average requirements modifications count 0.04

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 76%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 2% (3 from 190)
Final or estimated price not published 28% (54 from 190)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 190)
Missing supplier ID 2% (3 from 190)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 190)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 190)
Call and award notices contradict each other 2% (4 from 190)
Missing call for tenders 15% (28 from 190)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

58%
average 36%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 68% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.55 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

96%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 190)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 190)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 8% (15 from 190)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 190)
Supplier bankruptcy 1% (1 from 190)
Supplier donating to political party 3% (5 from 190)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 19% (37 from 190)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

100%
average 29%

Full disclosure

Buyer responded within 15 days legal limit.