Hospitals • 2015

Psychiatrická nemocnice Bohnice

IČO 00064220

Small number of firms recieve most of contracts. Buyer profile has high number of errors.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

82%
average 57%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
PL Bohnice – modernizace a rekonstrukce pavilonu č. 26
Stavební práce
10
Ø5 in industry
Úklidové služby
Čisticí a hygienické služby
4
Ø7 in industry
Zateplení ubytovny PNB
Stavební práce
8
Ø5 in industry
Komplexní služby odpadového hospodářství
Služby související s likvidací odpadů a odpady
5
Ø3 in industry
Komplexní servis prádla – krátké pracovní pláště
Praní a čištění
1
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

29%
average 69%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Avers, spol. s r.o.
2 57,310,106
Iss Facility Services s.r.o.
1 13,392,000
Trigema Building a.s.
1 4,999,077
Ipodec - Čisté Město a.s.
1 3,824,720
Suez Využití zdrojů a.s.
1 2,672,270
Other suppliers 6 5,360,367

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

94%
average 82%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (4 from 0)
Nonprice competition 20% (1 from 5)
Division into lots 40% (2 from 5)
E-auction 60% (3 from 5)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 5)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

34%
average 45%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 87,558,540
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 668,471,771
Total 756,030,312

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

99%
average 78%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
PL Bohnice - modernizace a rekonstrukce pavilonu č. 26, dodatečné stavební práce, změnové listy č. ZL 1, č. ZL 2, č. ZL 3 a č. ZL 4.
Dodatečné práce
- 314,600

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

33%
average 53%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 14%
Cancelled contracts 14%
Average requirements modifications count 1.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

84%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 12)
Final or estimated price not published 17% (2 from 12)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 12)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 12)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 12)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 12)
Missing call for tenders 8% (1 from 12)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 12)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 12)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

15%
average 45%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 21% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.18 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

99%
average 89%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 12)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 17% (2 from 12)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 33%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.