Government • 2015

Krajské ředitelství policie hlavního města Prahy

IČO 75151472

Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition. Lot of money goes into historical contracts and unregulated purchases.

22.
ranking
69%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

81%
average 61%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

62%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Mozis s.r.o.
2 41,131,418
Emv s.r.o.
2 19,278,530
Pressto, s.r.o.
1 18,196,329
Power Systems s.r.o.
1 12,355,400
ROFIS, s.r.o.
0 6,613,121
Other suppliers 5 13,905,927

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

25%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 120,396,217
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 1,801,180,855
Total 1,921,577,071

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

82%
average 61%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Dodání RDST TPH 700 s příslušenstvím (JUPITER) pro výkonné útvary Krajského ředitelství policie hl. m. Prahy
Předchozí zakázka bez nabídek, Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody), Jediný dodavatel (právní důvody)
- 3,256,550
Dodatečné stavební práce k VZ „Výstavba integrovaného operačního střediska KŘP hl. m. Prahy, Kongresová 2,140 21 Praha 4“
Předchozí zakázka bez nabídek, Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody), Dodatečné práce
- 2,398,531

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

96%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.14

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

75%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 12)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 12)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 12)
Missing supplier ID 8% (1 from 12)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 12)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 12)
Missing call for tenders 33% (4 from 12)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 12)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 12)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

53%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 59% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.43 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

74%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 12)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 42% (5 from 12)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 56%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.