State-owned enterprises • 2015

Vodovody a kanalizace Přerov, a.s.

IČO 47674521

Good buyer. The competition for contracts is high. Buyer profile has high number of errors.

3.
ranking
77%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

90%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Přerov - výstavba levobřežního a pravobřežního sběrače s napojením Dluhonic a Kozlovic
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
12
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce a přístavba – kanalizace Hranice – 1. Etapa
Stavební práce pro vodovodní a kanalizační potrubí
8
Ø5 in industry
Stavební úpravy vodovodu Bochoř
Stavební práce pro vodovodní a kanalizační potrubí
5
Ø5 in industry
Vodovod Kozlovice vč. přívodního řadu
Stavební práce pro vodovodní a kanalizační potrubí
7
Ø5 in industry
Správce stavby pro projekt: „Přerov - výstavba levobřežního a pravobřežního sběrače s napojením Dluhonic a Kozlovic“
Dohled nad stavebními pracemi
7
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

28%
average 62%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Ohl Žs, a.s.
1 351,884,264
Mebikan spol. s r.o.
2 27,315,767
Imos group s.r.o.
1 20,589,284
E.on Energie, a.s.
1 19,045,565
Insta Cz s.r.o.
2 15,537,976
Other suppliers 13 82,929,165

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

100%
average 67%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 517,302,022
Unregulated purchases 0
Total 517,302,022

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 73%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

75%
average 59%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 8%
Average requirements modifications count 0.83

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

81%
average 76%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 20)
Final or estimated price not published 15% (3 from 20)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 20)
Missing supplier ID 5% (1 from 20)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 20)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 20)
Call and award notices contradict each other 5% (1 from 20)
Missing call for tenders 5% (1 from 20)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 36%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 0% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.15 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

97%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 20)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 20)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 5% (1 from 20)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 20)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 20)
Supplier donating to political party 5% (1 from 20)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 5% (1 from 20)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

100%
average 29%

Full disclosure

Buyer responded within 15 days legal limit.