State-owned enterprises • 2015

Plzeňské městské dopravní podniky, a.s.

IČO 25220683

Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms. Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

7%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Vybudování nové dopravní základny pro Plzeňské městské dopravní podniky, a.s. a zajištění oprav, údržby a odstavu vozidel městské hromadné dopravy provozovaných na území města Plzně
Opravy a údržba vozidel a příslušenství k nim a související služby
1
Ø3 in industry
Dodávka tramvají
Tramvaje
2
Ø1 in industry
Nákup městských nízkopodlažních kloubových autobusů v délce 18m
Nízkopodlažní autobusy
4
Ø2 in industry
Dodávka motorové nafty
Motorová nafta (0,2)
4
Ø2 in industry
Dodávka motorové nafty
Motorová nafta (0,2)
4
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

2%
average 62%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Škoda City Service s.r.o.
1 11,999,249,120
Pragoimex a.s.
1 430,860,000
Petrol Plzeň, spol. s r.o.
3 235,440,000
Solaris Bus & Coach S.A.
0 124,285,000
Československá obchodní banka, a. s.
1 29,791,000
Other suppliers 5 65,571,488

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 78%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

100%
average 67%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 12,885,196,608
Zakazky maleho rozsahu 0
Unregulated purchases 0
Total 12,885,196,608

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

99%
average 73%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Puvodni zakazka (Kč) Zmena zavazku / JRBU (Kč)
Dodávka a instalace pomocných motorů do trolejbusů ŠKODA 24 Tr IRISBUS
Předchozí zakázka bez nabídek, Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody)
- 17,360,000

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

70%
average 59%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 27%
Average requirements modifications count 0.09

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

76%
average 76%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 12)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 12)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 12)
Missing supplier ID 8% (1 from 12)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 12)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 12)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 12)
Zakazka nema viteznou cenu 0% ( from 12)
Cena byla aktualizovana 0% ( from 12)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 36%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 0% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.03 (average mistakes per contract)
Uveřejňují se na profilu zakázky malého rozsahu? (Poměřujeme proti počtu zakázek v režimu zákona)
0-250K 0 zakázek
250K-500K 0 zakázek
500K-1000K 0 zakázek
1000K+ 0 zakázek

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

59%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 8% (1 from 12)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 12)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 8% (1 from 12)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 29%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.