Government • 2015

Agentura pro podporu podnikání a investic Czechinvest

IČO 71377999

Buyer does not avoid following procurement law. Buyer has seriously violated procurement law.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

51%
average 61%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

70%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Index Nosluš s.r.o.
1 110,000,000
Deloitte Advisory s.r.o.
1 83,330,000
Asd Software, s.r.o.
1 23,000,000
Jic, zájmové sdružení právnických osob
2 20,891,000
Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze
1 20,833,000
Other suppliers 42 92,296,723

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (1 from 0)
Nonprice competition 60% (3 from 5)
Division into lots 40% (2 from 5)
E-auction 0% (0 from 5)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 5)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

90%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 360,364,126
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 82,667,146
Total 443,031,272

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

55%
average 61%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

63%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 29%
Average requirements modifications count 0.75

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

69%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 2% (1 from 54)
Final or estimated price not published 41% (22 from 54)
Procedure type not published 13% (7 from 54)
Missing supplier ID 22% (12 from 54)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 54)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 54)
Missing call for tenders 6% (3 from 54)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 54)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 54)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

11%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 13% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.63 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

99%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 54)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 54)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 54)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 54)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 54)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 54)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 6% (3 from 54)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 56%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.