Government • 2015

Správa úložišť radioaktivních odpadů

IČO 66000769

Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids. Large volume of money is spent without open competition.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

10%
average 61%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Výzkumná podpora pro bezpečnostní hodnocení hlubinného úložiště
Výzkum a vývoj a související služby
1
Ø2 in industry
Vybudování podzemního výzkumného pracoviště Bukov
Stavební úpravy pro důlní činnost
1
Ø4 in industry
Výzkum a vývoj ukládacího obalového souboru pro hlubinné ukládání vyhořelého jaderného paliva do stádia realizace vzorku
Výzkum a experimentální vývoj
2
Ø2 in industry
Navržení, zajištění provedení a vyhodnocení experimentu EPSP v rámci projektu DOPAS
Geologický, geofyzikální a jiný vědecký průzkum
1
Ø2 in industry
Odborná pomoc v oblasti project managementu výběru lokality jaderného zařízení hlubinné úložiště
Příprava návrhů a projektů, odhad nákladů
1
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

57%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Újv Řež, a. s.
4 170,387,875
Diamo, státní podnik
1 68,076,290
Škoda Js a.s.
1 49,980,000
České vysoké učení technické v Praze
1 37,185,750
Pro Engineering,s.r.o.
1 28,000,000
Other suppliers 6 52,469,978

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (1 from 0)
Nonprice competition 100% (3 from 3)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

100%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 407,647,559
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 0
Total 407,647,559

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

15%
average 61%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Vybudování podzemního výzkumného pracoviště Bukov
Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody), Jediný dodavatel (právní důvody)
- 68,076,290
Navržení, zajištění provedení a vyhodnocení experimentu EPSP v rámci projektu DOPAS
Not disclosed
- 37,185,750
Odborná podpora při provedení a vyhodnocení experimentu EPSP v rámci projektu DOPAS
Not disclosed
- 9,287,875
Dokončení vývoje a ověření SW Flow123D v rámci projektu DECOVALEX 2015
Not disclosed
- 8,679,000
Zapojení v projektu Material Corrosion Test (MaCoTe)
Not disclosed
- 5,422,080

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

28%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 13%
Cancelled contracts 50%
Average requirements modifications count 1.38

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

54%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 18)
Final or estimated price not published 11% (2 from 18)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 18)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 18)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 18)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 18)
Missing call for tenders 6% (1 from 18)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 18)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 18)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

39%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 63% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.53 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

76%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 18)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 6% (1 from 18)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 6% (1 from 18)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 18)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 18)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 18)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 6% (1 from 18)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

75%
average 56%

Full disclosure

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.