Government • 2019 • past ranking

Český úřad zeměměřický a katastrální

IČO 00025712

Good buyer. Purchases are made in legal regime, there is no tendency to portion contracts. Competitions are open to multiple bidders.

2.
ranking
83%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

78%
average 57%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
„Rozvoj a údržba Informačního systému katastru nemovitostí v letech 2019 - 2022“
Programování programového vybavení a poradenské služby
3
Ø2 in industry
Podpora programového vybavení ORACLE - Část A - Oracle Premier Support
Podpora programového vybavení
5
Ø1 in industry
Rozvoj a údržba Informačního systému (IS) registru územní identifikace, adres a nemovitostí, IS územní identifikace a IS veřejného dálkového přístupu v letech 2016– 2019
Služby programového vybavení
6
Ø2 in industry
Obnova osobních počítačů 2017
Zařízení související s počítači
4
Ø2 in industry
Obnova síťové infrastruktury ČÚZK
Místní sítě
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

81%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
NESS Czech s.r.o.
3 404,398,620
SEFIRA spol. s r.o.
3 144,984,930
HP Inc Czech Republic s.r.o.
1 112,393,806
GC System a.s.
23 102,705,096
T-Mobile Czech Republic a.s.
13 57,611,261
Other suppliers 176 586,147,716

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

57%
average 43%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 18% (7 from 38)
Nonprice competition 21% (8 from 38)
Division into lots 18% (7 from 38)
E-auction 0% (0 from 38)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 38)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

100%
average 75%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 1,831,262,051
Small scale tenders 82,707,330
Unregulated purchases 0
Total 1,641,592,954

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 75%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

68%
average 64%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 3%
Cancelled contracts 12%
Average requirements modifications count 0.41
Average decision length 83.36 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

91%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 57)
Final or estimated price not published 5% (3 from 57)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 57)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 57)
Missing buyer ID 2% (1 from 57)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 57)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 57)
Missing winning price 2% (1 from 57)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 2% (1 from 57)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

73%
average 57%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.31 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 54 tenders under the law)
0-250K 46 tenders
250K-500K 20 tenders
500K-1000K 24 tenders
1000K+ 28 tenders