Government • 2015

Český úřad zeměměřický a katastrální

IČO 00025712

Large volume of money is spent without open competition. Purchases are made in legal regime, there is no tendency to portion contracts.

45.
ranking
64%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

62%
average 61%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

81%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Oracle Czech s.r.o.
2 129,240,474
O2 Czech Republic a.s.
1 98,816,500
Cca Group a.s.
1 96,200,000
Gc System a.s.
5 74,188,573
Ness Czech s.r.o.
1 72,915,500
Other suppliers 33 249,716,445

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

77%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 721,077,493
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 494,581,761
Total 1,215,659,255

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

6%
average 61%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
„Poskytování služeb technické podpory k SW produktům společnosti Oracle“
Jediný dodavatel (právní důvody)
- 120,552,474
Poskytování veřejně dostupných služeb elektronických komunikací
Not disclosed
- 98,816,500
„Zajištění podpory provozu a rozvoje Informačního systému základního Registru územní identifikace, adres a nemovitostí, jeho agendového informačního systému územní identifikace a aplikace veřejného dálkového přístupu“
Krajní naléhavost
- 72,915,500
Poskytnutí rozšířených služeb podpory Bentley SELECT 2012-2015
Jediný dodavatel (právní důvody)
- 37,375,688
Upgrade AIX
Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody)
- 9,499,950

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

63%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 19%
Average requirements modifications count 0.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

40%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 15% (7 from 48)
Final or estimated price not published 40% (19 from 48)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 48)
Missing supplier ID 2% (1 from 48)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 48)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 48)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 48)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 48)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 48)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

31%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 38% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.73 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

88%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 48)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 48)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 8% (4 from 48)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 48)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 48)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 48)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 12% (6 from 48)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

100%
average 56%

Full disclosure

Buyer responded within 15 days legal limit.