Small cities • 2016

Město Semily

IČO 00276111

There are not many contract extensions and ammendments. The risks of corruption and inefficiency are relatively low for chosen suppliers.

144.
ranking
71%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

56%
average 59%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

52%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
D - Bau s.r.o.
5 38,448,979
Syban, s.r.o.
1 12,488,000
Pražská plynárenská, a.s.
2 7,391,669
Colas Cz, a.s.
1 5,839,741
Sovis Cz, a.s.
1 4,938,774
Other suppliers 6 10,671,508

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (1 from 2)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)
Inovativni 0% ( from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

67%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 33%
Average requirements modifications count 0.33

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

87%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 12% (2 from 16)
Final or estimated price not published 6% (1 from 16)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 16)
Missing supplier ID 6% (1 from 16)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 16)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 16)
Missing call for tenders 19% (3 from 16)
Zakazka nema viteznou cenu 0% ( from 16)
Cena byla aktualizovana 0% ( from 16)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

95%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 16)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 19% (3 from 16)