Government • 2015

Národní Technické Museum

IČO 00023299

Small number of firms recieve most of contracts. Buyer does not avoid following procurement law.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

38%
average 61%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Centrum stavitelského dědictví v Plasích, II. etapa – památková obnova komplexu Hospodářského dvora
Rekonstrukce budov
8
Ø5 in industry
Veřejná zakázka na výběr stavební firmy pro I. etapu projektu Centrum stavitelského dědictví v Plasích - památkovou obnovu komplexu Pivovaru
Výstavba historických památek a památníků
5
Ø3 in industry
Dodatek č. 2- výstavba depozitární haly č. 3 - Čelákovice.
Výstavba muzeí
1
Ø1 in industry
Stavba plotu v Železničním depozitáři NTM Chomutov III.
Instalace a montáž oplocení, zábradlí a bezpečnostních zařízení
2
Ø4 in industry
Realizace stálé expozice Fotoateliér II. v hlavní budově Národního technického muzea
Služby muzeí a ochrana historických památek a budov
1
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

13%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Unistav a.s.
10 396,830,314
Hochtief Cz a. s.
1 94,729,347
" M plus " spol. s r.o.
4 20,168,363
Nepro stavební a.s.
1 6,967,602
Stis stavební a inženýrská společnost, s.r.o.
2 4,071,920
Other suppliers 10 15,601,477

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (1 from 3)
Nonprice competition 67% (2 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

100%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 807,791,739
Unregulated purchases 0
Total 807,791,739

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 61%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

16%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 32%
Cancelled contracts 18%
Average requirements modifications count 0.91

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

71%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 28)
Final or estimated price not published 29% (8 from 28)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 28)
Missing supplier ID 43% (12 from 28)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 28)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 28)
Call and award notices contradict each other 29% (8 from 28)
Missing call for tenders 18% (5 from 28)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 0% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.40 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

94%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 28)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 4% (1 from 28)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 28)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 28)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 28)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 28)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 0% (0 from 28)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

100%
average 56%

Full disclosure

Buyer responded within 15 days legal limit.