Hospitals • 2015

Nemocnice Znojmo, příspěvková organizace

IČO 00092584

Small number of firms recieve most of contracts. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

35%
average 57%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Nemocnice Znojmo - rekonstrukce a dostavba, II. etapa - 2. část - akce I
Stavební úpravy objektů sloužících pro zdravotní péči
3
Ø4 in industry
ZATEPLENÍ OBJEKTŮ LŮŽKOVÉ ČÁSTI A KOMPLEMENTŮ NA UL. MUDr. JANA JANSKÉHO 11 VE ZNOJMĚ
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce a dostavba Nemocnice Znojmo - stavební úpravy pro oční zákrokový sál
Architektonické, stavební, technické a inspekční služby
1
Ø5 in industry
Počítačový tomograf (CT) pro oddělení radiologické a zobrazovacích metod Nemocnice Znojmo
Tomografické přístroje
2
Ø2 in industry
Hybridní SPECT/CT gama kamera pro oddělení nukleární medicíny Nemocnice Znojmo
Gama kamery
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

30%
average 69%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Imos Brno, a.s.
4 388,689,917
Trigema Building a.s.
2 52,265,774
Philips Česká republika s.r.o.
3 33,791,231
Edomed a.s.
2 32,694,207
Inter - Stav, spol. s r.o.
2 23,398,780
Other suppliers 20 55,493,288

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

54%
average 45%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 586,333,198
Unregulated purchases 1,459,307,302
Total 2,045,640,500

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

89%
average 78%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

46%
average 53%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 27%
Average requirements modifications count 1.33

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 33)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 33)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 33)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 33)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 33)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 33)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 33)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 33)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

69%
average 45%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 72% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.19 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

95%
average 89%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 33)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 33)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 33)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 33)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 33)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 33)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 18% (6 from 33)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 33%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.