State-owned enterprises • 2015

Severočeské doly a.s.

IČO 49901982

Relatively small fraction of purchases is spent according to law. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure.

32.
ranking
67%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

47%
average 52%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

57%
average 62%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Královopolská Ria, a.s.
2 349,833,488
Herkul a.s.
1 338,800,000
Gth catering a.s.
1 101,608,616
Proffa s.r.o.
1 74,772,720
Prodeco, a.s.
1 59,212,779
Other suppliers 7 108,343,120

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

23%
average 67%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 1,032,570,724
Unregulated purchases 19,265,069,776
Total 20,297,640,500

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

93%
average 73%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

81%
average 59%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.75

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

80%
average 76%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 13)
Final or estimated price not published 38% (5 from 13)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 13)
Missing supplier ID 8% (1 from 13)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 13)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 13)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 13)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 13)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

53%
average 36%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 67% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.84 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

89%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 8% (1 from 13)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 8% (1 from 13)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 15% (2 from 13)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

25%
average 29%

Non-disclosure

Buyer responded within 15 days legal limit.