Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Frýdlant

IČO 00262781

Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability. The competition for contracts is high.

58.
ranking
71%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

74%
average 49%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

60%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Vodohospodářské stavby, společnost s ručením omezeným
1 22,946,184
Pozemní stavitelství s.r.o.
1 9,950,623
SIZ s.r.o.
1 9,773,983
Porr a.s.
1 8,460,000
Česká spořitelna, a.s.
1 2,629,997
Other suppliers 3 6,508,519

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 67% (2 from 3)
Nonprice competition 33% (1 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

46%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 84,503,144
Unregulated purchases 308,558,384
Total 393,061,528

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

83%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

95%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 8)
Final or estimated price not published 12% (1 from 8)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 8)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 8)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 8)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 8)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 8)
Missing call for tenders 12% (1 from 8)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

9%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 50% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.63 (average mistakes per contract)