State-owned enterprises • 2015

Výzkumný a zkušební letecký ústav, a.s.

IČO 00010669

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. Buyer does not support competition by using e-auctions, lots or extended deadlines.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

35%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Chlazení aerodynamického tunelu
Chlazení a ventilace
1
Ø3 in industry
Ventilátor aerodynamického tunelu
Ventilátory
2
Ø3 in industry
Rekonstrukce rozvodny
Stavební montážní práce
8
Ø4 in industry
Frekvenční měnič s příslušenstvím
Měniče
4
Ø3 in industry
Výměna oken a dveří v areálu VZLÚ
Okna
7
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

58%
average 62%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Zvvz Machinery, a.s.
2 26,370,000
Window Holding a.s.
2 6,241,023
Elektro-trakce,s.r.o.
1 6,197,727
Labtech s.r.o.
2 4,255,650
Blumenbecker Prag s.r.o.
1 3,211,000
Other suppliers 4 12,421,808

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 2)
Nonprice competition 100% (2 from 2)
Lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

43%
average 67%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 58,697,208
Unregulated purchases 264,610,292
Total 323,307,500

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

13%
average 73%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Chlazení aerodynamického tunelu
Předchozí zakázka bez nabídek
16,480,000
Rozšíření řídicího systému IST Hydropuls na 18 kanálů
Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody), Dodatečné práce
2,623,500
Únavové čelisti pro zkoušky v prostředí s kapacitou 250 kN
Not disclosed
2,375,900
Rozšíření ovládacího kontroleru MTS Aero-90
Not disclosed
1,879,750

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

38%
average 59%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 33%
Average requirements modifications count 0.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

85%
average 76%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 14)
Final or estimated price not published 57% (8 from 14)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 14)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 14)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 14)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 14)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 14)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 14)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

62%
average 36%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.52 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

76%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 14)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 14% (2 from 14)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier donating to political party 7% (1 from 14)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 14% (2 from 14)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 29%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.