Government • 2015

Státní fond životního prostředí České republiky

IČO 00020729

Court found serious misconduct. Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability.

45.
ranking
64%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

78%
average 61%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

91%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Pelikán Krofta Kohoutek advokátní kancelář s.r.o.
2 11,650,000
Cz Maruto s.r.o.
3 10,500,000
Advokátní kancelář Brož, Sedlatý s.r.o.
1 10,000,000
Komix s.r.o.
1 8,700,000
Glossa, s.r.o.
1 6,850,000
Other suppliers 65 77,831,668

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 40% (2 from 5)
Nonprice competition 80% (4 from 5)
Lots 0% (0 from 5)
E-auction 0% (0 from 5)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

51%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 126,531,668
Unregulated purchases 364,662,214
Total 491,193,882

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

87%
average 61%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Systémový audit Programu Zelená úsporám – Jednací řízení bez uveřejnění
Dodatečné práce
2,317,500
Servisní zásah databáze Oracle
Krajní naléhavost
964,000
Autorské SW IS NP, IS OPI a IS řízení akcí GIS
Jediný dodavatel (právní důvody)
950,000

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 7%
Cancelled contracts 54%
Average requirements modifications count 0.82

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

37%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 3% (2 from 73)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 73)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 73)
Missing supplier ID 7% (5 from 73)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 73)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 73)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 73)
Missing call for tenders 19% (14 from 73)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 0% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.00 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

96%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 73)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 73)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 73)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 73)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 73)
Supplier donating to political party 1% (1 from 73)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 7% (5 from 73)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

100%
average 56%

Full disclosure

Buyer responded within 15 days legal limit.