Small cities • 2016

Město Dobruška

IČO 00274879

Small number of firms does not recieve majority of contracts. Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

64%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Městská rozlučková síň v Dobrušce
Stavební montážní práce
9
Ø4 in industry
MŠ Dobruška - Za Universitou 875, zateplení budovy, přístavba zádveří a požárních schodišť
Stavební práce
7
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce Úpravny vody Dobruška
Stavební práce na výstavbě úpraven vody
3
Ø4 in industry
Zateplení ZŠ Fr. Kupky č. p. 433
Stavební montážní práce
17
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce ulice 1. máje v Dobrušce
Výstavba vedlejších komunikací
11
Ø6 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

78%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Stating s.r.o.
3 16,167,899
Trepart s.r.o.
1 12,937,789
Marius Pedersen a.s.
2 9,522,414
Kunst, spol. s r.o.
1 7,359,830
Kenvi Cz s.r.o.
1 5,329,992
Other suppliers 12 25,689,269

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 100% (3 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

86%
average 84%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 25%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

77%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 20)
Final or estimated price not published 5% (1 from 20)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 20)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 20)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 20)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 20)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 20)
Missing call for tenders 10% (2 from 20)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

75%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 20)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 20)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 5% (1 from 20)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 20)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 20)
Supplier donating to political party 15% (3 from 20)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 30% (6 from 20)