Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Dobřany

IČO 00256552

Buyer does not support competition by using e-auctions, lots or extended deadlines. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

46%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Sportovní areál v Dobřanech
Výstavba víceúčelových sportovních zařízení
5
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace areálu FC Dobřany
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Obytná zóna Malá Strana
Stavební práce
7
Ø5 in industry
Stavební úpravy a vestavba bytů v domě na nám. TGM 145 v Dobřanech
Stavební úpravy domů
1
Ø4 in industry
DOBŘANY, Rekonstrukce II/180 (ul. 1. máje), MK Pobřežní, U Radbuzy - II. část
Stavební práce
9
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

58%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
SMP CZ, a.s.
1 47,879,891
VYSSPA Sports Technology s.r.o.
2 22,949,293
STRABAG a.s.
2 13,705,889
BIS, a.s.
1 9,383,333
Silnice Klatovy a.s.
1 5,919,094
Other suppliers 4 15,461,129

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

0%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

48%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 132,543,040
Unregulated purchases 440,949,966
Total 573,493,006

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

99%
average 91%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
REVITALIZACE AREÁLU FC Dobřany - dodatečné práce
Additional works
169,764

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

67%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 33%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

88%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 12)
Final or estimated price not published 33% (4 from 12)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 12)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 12)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 12)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 12)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 12)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 12)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

93%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.27 (average mistakes per contract)