State-owned enterprises • 2015

Nemocnice Milosrdných bratří, příspěvková organizace

IČO 48512478

Large volume of money is spent without open competition. Buyer publishes without flaws in procurement journal.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

37%
average 52%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

43%
average 62%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Syner Morava, a.s.
3 48,582,533
Psk Group, spol. s r.o.
3 42,995,307
Keltex spol. s r. o.
1 18,461,877
Ave komunální služby a.s.
1 2,469,578
Orgatec, spol. s r.o.
1 1,184,500
Other suppliers 2 1,972,900

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 78%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

46%
average 67%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 115,666,695
Unregulated purchases 437,394,151
Total 553,060,846

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

48%
average 73%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

63%
average 59%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 17%
Average requirements modifications count 1.33

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 76%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 9% (1 from 11)
Final or estimated price not published 27% (3 from 11)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 11)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 11)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 11)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 11)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 11)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 11)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

46%
average 36%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 62% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.02 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

82%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 11)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier bankruptcy 9% (1 from 11)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 18% (2 from 11)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 29%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.