Hospitals • 2015

Uherskohradišťská nemocnice a.s.

IČO 27660915

Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms. Purchases are made in legal regime, there is no tendency to portion contracts.

11.
ranking
70%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

88%
average 57%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Centrální objekty 1.etapa
Stavební úpravy objektů sloužících pro zdravotní péči
17
Ø4 in industry
Poskytnutí úvěru na financování akce Centrální objekt I.etapa
Poskytování úvěrů
3
Ø2 in industry
Centrální objekty 1.etapa - dodatečné stavební práce
Výstavba speciálních zdravotnických budov
1
Ø3 in industry
Centrální objekty 1.etapa - dodatečné stavební práce II
Výstavba speciálních zdravotnických budov
1
Ø3 in industry
Počítačový tomograf CT
Zdravotnické přístroje
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

33%
average 69%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Geosan Stavební a.s.
6 361,113,405
Československá obchodní banka, a. s.
1 144,487,944
Block a.s.
4 17,229,230
Philips Česká republika s.r.o.
1 14,316,600
Stavby Vanto, s.r.o.
1 9,390,139
Other suppliers 16 48,508,503

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

80%
average 45%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 595,045,821
Unregulated purchases 332,175,322
Total 927,221,143

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

61%
average 78%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Centrální objekty 1.etapa - dodatečné stavební práce
Dodatečné práce
18,401,083
Centrální objekty 1.etapa - dodatečné stavební práce II
Dodatečné práce
17,202,888
Počítačový tomograf CT
Předchozí zakázka bez nabídek
14,316,600
Centrální objekty 1.etapa - dodatečné stavební práce III
Dodatečné práce
7,936,209
Centrální objekty 1. etapa - dodatečné stavební práce IV
Dodatečné práce
6,688,184

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

46%
average 53%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 11%
Cancelled contracts 18%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

91%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 29)
Final or estimated price not published 34% (10 from 29)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 29)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 29)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 29)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 29)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 29)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 29)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

41%
average 45%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 54% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.00 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

76%
average 89%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 29)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 29)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 3% (1 from 29)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 29)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 29)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 29)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 7% (2 from 29)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

75%
average 33%

Full disclosure

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.