State-owned enterprises • 2015

České dráhy, a.s.

IČO 70994226

Buyer does not avoid following procurement law. Buyer has seriously violated procurement law.

25.
ranking
69%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

58%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Dodávky motorové nafty 2014 - 2017
Nafta (EN 590)
3
Ø2 in industry
Dodávka silové elektřiny pro elektrickou trakci 2015 - 2016
Elektrická energie
3
Ø4 in industry
Rámcová smlouva na dodávky elektrických jednotek pro dálkovou dopravu
Kolejová vozidla
1
Ø1 in industry
Dodávka 14 elektrických jednotek pro dálkovou dopravu
Kolejová vozidla
neuveden
Ø1 in industry
Dodávka silové elektřiny pro elektrickou trakci - 2012
Elektrická energie
4
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

68%
average 62%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Čez Prodej, s.r.o.
4 8,619,654,252
Unipetrol Rpa, s.r.o.
1 6,669,000,000
Škoda Vagonka  a.s.
3 6,201,350,000
Pars nova a.s.
5 2,761,028,660
Movo spol. s r. o.
4 1,833,478,290
Other suppliers 70 5,129,359,006

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

94%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 13% (7 from 54)
Nonprice competition 13% (7 from 54)
Lots 22% (12 from 54)
E-auction 46% (25 from 54)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

100%
average 67%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 31,239,339,225
Unregulated purchases 0
Total 31,239,339,225

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

95%
average 73%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

54%
average 59%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 9%
Cancelled contracts 31%
Average requirements modifications count 0.41

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

79%
average 76%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 1% (1 from 93)
Final or estimated price not published 5% (5 from 93)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 93)
Missing supplier ID 4% (4 from 93)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 93)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 93)
Call and award notices contradict each other 2% (2 from 93)
Missing call for tenders 20% (19 from 93)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

17%
average 36%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 24% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.27 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

99%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 1% (1 from 93)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 93)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 93)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 93)
Supplier bankruptcy 1% (1 from 93)
Supplier donating to political party 4% (4 from 93)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 11% (10 from 93)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 29%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.