Hospitals • 2015

Ústřední vojenská nemocnice - Vojenská fakultní nemocnice Praha

IČO 61383082

Often makes mistakes in procurement journal announcements. Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

81%
average 57%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Vybudování centra forenzní medicíny
Výstavba nemocničních zařízení
7
Ø3 in industry
Infekční oddělení ÚVN Praha, stavební úpravy pavilonu E
Rekonstrukce budov
8
Ø5 in industry
Snížení energetických ztrát pavilonu B
Rekonstrukce budov
10
Ø5 in industry
Lékárna
Rekonstrukce budov
6
Ø5 in industry
Angiolinka pro kardiologické oddělení
Angiografické přístroje
3
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

88%
average 69%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Cetus Plus, a.s.
2 109,334,767
Biotronik Praha, spol. s r. o.
4 34,486,956
B & J Holding,a.s.
4 33,355,870
Emv s.r.o.
1 28,976,000
Inlab Medical, s.r.o.
4 25,947,828
Other suppliers 91 328,833,322

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 82%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 2)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

40%
average 45%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 560,934,751
Unregulated purchases 2,972,020,487
Total 3,532,955,238

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

98%
average 78%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Přístroj - prokládací nízkoteplotní sterilizační systém s evidence based
Not disclosed
2,800,011

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

9%
average 53%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 72%
Cancelled contracts 21%
Average requirements modifications count 0.12

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

1%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 106)
Final or estimated price not published 99% (105 from 106)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 106)
Missing supplier ID 6% (6 from 106)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 106)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 106)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 106)
Missing call for tenders 85% (90 from 106)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

34%
average 45%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 42% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.77 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

85%
average 89%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 106)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 1% (1 from 106)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 1% (1 from 106)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 106)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 106)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 106)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 23% (24 from 106)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

100%
average 33%

Full disclosure

Buyer responded within 15 days legal limit.