Government • 2015

Státní úřad pro jadernou bezpečnost

IČO 48136069

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

57%
average 61%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Převod aplikace Registry SÚJB
Programování aplikačního programového vybavení
1
Ø1 in industry
Programové vybavení pro hodnocení vlivu normálního provozu jaderných elektráren na okolí
Vývoj programového vybavení na zakázku
1
Ø1 in industry
Obnova diskového pole
Vícenásobné diskové pole nezávislých disků (RAID)
3
Ø3 in industry
CZ ICT - 1. část
Osobní počítače
2
Ø3 in industry
CZ ICT - 3. část
Síťové servery
3
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

75%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Bios - služby výpočetní techniky, s.r.o.
2 8,366,800
S&t Cz s.r.o.
2 6,608,858
Ing. Peter Čarný - Abmerit
1 6,000,000
Dateco,s.r.o.
1 3,256,000
Pražská energetika, a.s.
2 3,236,722
Other suppliers 9 11,179,187

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 40% (2 from 5)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 5)
Lots 0% (0 from 5)
E-auction 0% (0 from 5)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

37%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 38,647,568
Unregulated purchases 237,052,100
Total 275,699,667

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

12%
average 61%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Převod aplikace Registry SÚJB
Jediný dodavatel (právní důvody)
6,551,800
Programové vybavení pro hodnocení vlivu normálního provozu jaderných elektráren na okolí
Not disclosed
6,000,000
Aktualizace SSL
Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody)
1,815,000
Technická podpora programového vybavení MonRaS
Not disclosed
1,520,000

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

71%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 29%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

33%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 17)
Final or estimated price not published 59% (10 from 17)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 17)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 17)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 17)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 17)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 17)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 17)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

55%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 80% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.24 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

89%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 17)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 17)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 17)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 17)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 17)
Supplier donating to political party 6% (1 from 17)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 12% (2 from 17)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

100%
average 56%

Full disclosure

Buyer responded within 15 days legal limit.