State-owned enterprises • 2015

Letiště Praha, a. s.

IČO 28244532

Buyer has seriously violated procurement law. The competition for contracts is high.

20.
ranking
71%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

74%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Dodávky motorové nafty a benzinu Natural BA 95.
Nafta
3
Ø3 in industry
Oprava RWY 06/24-II. etapa a Oprava RWY 06/24-III. etapa letiště Praha Ruzyně
Stavební úpravy přistávacích ploch, rozjezdových drah a manévrovacích ploch
8
Ø5 in industry
Dodávky elektrické energie pro Letiště Praha na roky 2014 a 2015.
Elektrická energie, vytápění, solární a jaderná energie
6
Ø4 in industry
Rozšíření ČOV + ČKV JIH - Letiště Praha Ruzyně
Stavební úpravy pro čistírny odpadních vod, čisticí stanice a spalovny odpadů
14
Ø5 in industry
Dodávky zemního plynu pro Letiště Praha na roky 2015, 2016 a 2017.
Zemní plyn
6
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

81%
average 62%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Unipetrol Rpa, s.r.o.
1 524,981,600
Pragoplyn, a.s.
2 372,716,197
Strabag a.s.
1 359,680,370
Pražská energetika, a.s.
1 293,920,000
TRACE GROUP HOLD a.s.
0 239,920,000
Other suppliers 25 975,605,497

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

94%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (1 from 0)
Nonprice competition 19% (5 from 26)
Division into lots 4% (1 from 26)
E-auction 35% (9 from 26)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 26)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

53%
average 67%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 2,946,663,850
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 7,559,520,150
Total 10,506,184,000

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

89%
average 73%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Obměna EDS v třídírně T2, letiště Praha/Ruzyně
Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody)
- 49,224,779
Postupné dodávky pevné a kapalné odmrazovací látky na letištní plochy 2012/2013
Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody)
- 36,582,400

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

73%
average 59%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 5%
Cancelled contracts 17%
Average requirements modifications count 0.15

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

89%
average 76%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 31)
Final or estimated price not published 3% (1 from 31)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 31)
Missing supplier ID 29% (9 from 31)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 31)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 31)
Missing call for tenders 13% (4 from 31)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 31)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 31)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

50%
average 36%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 85% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.64 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

86%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 31)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 31)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 13% (4 from 31)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 31)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 31)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 31)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 19% (6 from 31)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 29%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.