We rate all 13 regions of Czech Republic. • 2016

Pardubický kraj

IČO 70892822

Good buyer. There are not many contract extensions and ammendments. Buyer has seriously violated procurement law.

3.
ranking
80%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

66%
average 69%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

95%
average 90%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Geosan Stavební a.s.
4 197,213,517
M - Silnice a.s.
5 165,059,569
Pragoplyn, a.s.
2 143,667,588
Centropol Energy, a.s.
4 141,359,281
Čsad Ústí nad Orlicí, a.s.
1 121,062,000
Other suppliers 304 2,130,164,179

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

72%
average 76%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (48 from 0)
Nonprice competition 3% (3 from 114)
Division into lots 20% (23 from 114)
E-auction 1% (1 from 114)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 114)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

74%
average 76%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 2,982,719,598
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 2,431,283,970
Total 5,414,003,568

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

87%
average 69%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

70%
average 62%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 6%
Cancelled contracts 22%
Average requirements modifications count 0.65

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

94%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 1% (2 from 320)
Final or estimated price not published 6% (19 from 320)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 320)
Missing supplier ID 2% (5 from 320)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 320)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 320)
Missing call for tenders 3% (10 from 320)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 320)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 320)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

88%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 320)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 2% (5 from 320)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (1 from 320)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 320)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (1 from 320)
Supplier donating to political party 4% (12 from 320)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 19% (60 from 320)