City parts • 2016

Městská část Praha 12

IČO 00231151

Good buyer. Buyer supports competition by providing extended deadlines for tender submissions. The competition for contracts is high.

2.
ranking
77%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

76%
average 53%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Revitalizace objektu Základní školy Rakovského v Praze 12
Stavební práce
9
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace objektu Základní školy profesora Švejcara v Praze 12
Stavební práce
10
Ø5 in industry
Rekreační a kondiční areál RAK
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace areálu Čechtická 758, Praha 12 - Kamýk - druhé zadání
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
Regenerace areálu Modřanské vinice - I. etapa - replika původní stodoly a sadové úpravy
Stavební práce
neuveden
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

86%
average 63%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Brychtastav s.r.o.
1 29,831,382
Kyrastav spol. s r.o.
1 24,555,348
Zahradní Architektura Tábor s.r.o.
2 23,101,962
Tsb spol.s r.o.
2 21,030,956
Polabská stavební Cz, s.r.o.
2 13,796,797
Other suppliers 19 114,957,121

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

88%
average 62%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 65% (11 from 17)
Nonprice competition 12% (2 from 17)
Lots 47% (8 from 17)
E-auction 12% (2 from 17)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

88%
average 81%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
"Dodávka hardware, software a implementace"
Předchozí zakázka bez nabídek, Předchozí zakázka bez nabídek
7,302,120

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

57%
average 67%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 19%
Average requirements modifications count 0.73

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

79%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 4% (1 from 27)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 27)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 27)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 27)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 27)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 27)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 27)
Missing call for tenders 22% (6 from 27)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

85%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 27)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 4% (1 from 27)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 7% (2 from 27)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 27)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 27)
Supplier donating to political party 7% (2 from 27)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 15% (4 from 27)