Government • 2015

Krajské ředitelství policie Jihomoravského kraje

IČO 75151499

Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure. Relatively small fraction of purchases is spent according to law.

36.
ranking
66%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

82%
average 61%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

66%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Vašstav, s.r.o.
1 38,204,709
Psk Group, spol. s r.o.
4 19,545,513
Candela, s.r.o.
5 13,803,151
Life Technologies Czech Republic s.r.o.
1 5,800,000
S-a-s Stavby spol. s r.o.
2 4,876,731
Other suppliers 16 25,476,934

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 9% (1 from 11)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 11)
Lots 73% (8 from 11)
E-auction 0% (0 from 11)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

33%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 107,707,039
Unregulated purchases 866,558,406
Total 974,265,445

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

61%
average 61%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

94%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 8%
Average requirements modifications count 0.25

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

68%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 3% (1 from 29)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 29)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 29)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 29)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 29)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 29)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 29)
Missing call for tenders 3% (1 from 29)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

24%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 29% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.62 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

90%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 29)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 29)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 29)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 29)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 29)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 29)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 31% (9 from 29)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 56%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.