Government • 2015

Probační a mediační služba

IČO 70888060

Buyer profile has high number of errors. Procurement journal misses vital information (prices, suppliers..).

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

62%
average 61%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

65%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Pmvia s.r.o.
4 11,782,900
Marlin, s.r.o.
4 11,590,086
Asociace občanských poraden
15 6,990,000
Čd - Telematika a.s.
1 4,257,600
M.c.triton, spol. s r.o.
1 3,196,700
Other suppliers 10 9,700,855

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 1)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

53%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 60,287,141
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 154,293,796
Total 214,580,937

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

88%
average 61%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Portace virtuálního prostředí do Důvěryhodné výpočetní základny
Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody), Jediný dodavatel (právní důvody)
- 1,240,000
None
Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody), Jediný dodavatel (právní důvody)
- 689,000

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

63%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 78%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.75

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

27%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 35)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 35)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 35)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 35)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 35)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 35)
Missing call for tenders 20% (7 from 35)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 35)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 35)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 0% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.92 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

98%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 35)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 35)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 35)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 35)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 35)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 35)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 3% (1 from 35)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 56%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.