Government • 2015

Probační a mediační služba

IČO 70888060

Buyer profile has high number of errors. Procurement journal misses vital information (prices, suppliers..).

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

62%
average 61%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

65%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Pmvia s.r.o.
4 11,782,900
Marlin, s.r.o.
4 11,590,086
Asociace občanských poraden
15 6,990,000
Čd - Telematika a.s.
1 4,257,600
M.c.triton, spol. s r.o.
1 3,196,700
Other suppliers 10 9,700,855

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 1)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

53%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 60,287,141
Unregulated purchases 154,293,796
Total 214,580,937

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

88%
average 61%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Portace virtuálního prostředí do Důvěryhodné výpočetní základny
Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody), Jediný dodavatel (právní důvody)
1,240,000
None
Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody), Jediný dodavatel (právní důvody)
689,000

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

63%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 78%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.75

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

27%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 35)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 35)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 35)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 35)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 35)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 35)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 35)
Missing call for tenders 20% (7 from 35)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 0% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.92 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

98%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 35)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 35)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 35)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 35)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 35)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 35)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 3% (1 from 35)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 56%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.