Hospitals • 2015

Litomyšlská nemocnice, a.s.

IČO 27520579

Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability. Relatively small fraction of purchases is spent according to law.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

67%
average 57%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Modernizace přístrojového vybavení iktového centra III.
Biochemické analyzátory
3
Ø2 in industry
Digitalizace mamografického pracoviště
Mamografické přístroje
4
Ø3 in industry
Internát – energeticky úsporná opatření – SO.01
Stavební úpravy budov sloužících k ubytování
3
Ø5 in industry
Management glaukomu
Oftalmologické zařízení
2
Ø2 in industry
Praní, žehlení a opravy prádla 2012-2014
Praní a čištění
4
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

75%
average 69%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Roche s.r.o.
1 8,954,782
Fomei a.s.
1 6,013,181
Hospimed, spol. s r.o.
3 5,278,518
První litomyšlská stavební a.s.
2 4,129,213
Audioscan, spol. s r.o.
2 3,002,000
Other suppliers 19 9,858,101

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 82%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (1 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Division into lots 50% (1 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 2)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

25%
average 45%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 37,512,302
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 556,153,198
Total 593,665,500

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

87%
average 78%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Modernizace přístrojového vybavení iktového centra XIII. – Monitory vitálních funkcí - ARO
Not disclosed
- 817,329
Internát – energeticky úsporná opatření – SO.02 - rekonstrukce otopných ploch objektu Internátu
Krajní naléhavost, Dodatečné práce
- 273,629
Internát – energeticky úsporná opatření – SO.01 - změna skladby střechy
Krajní naléhavost, Dodatečné práce
- 146,522

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

63%
average 53%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 50%
Average requirements modifications count 0.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 28)
Final or estimated price not published 7% (2 from 28)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 28)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 28)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 28)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 28)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 28)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 28)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 28)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 45%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 0% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.00 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

92%
average 89%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 28)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 28)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 28)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 28)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 28)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 28)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 21% (6 from 28)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 33%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.