Government • 2015

Krajské ředitelství policie Moravskoslezského kraje

IČO 75151502

Relatively small fraction of purchases is spent according to law. Buyer profile has high number of errors.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

68%
average 61%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Kasárna F-M - rekonstrukce venkovních rozvodů tepelné energie včetně instalace výměníkových stanic do jednotlivých objektů
Vytápění
9
Ø3 in industry
Realizace úspor energie - Policie ČR Karviná
Stavební úpravy objektů používaných pořádkovými službami
7
Ø14 in industry
Materiály pro stanovení profilů DNA - PowerPlex ESI 17 Systém
Různé chemické výrobky
1
Ø2 in industry
Automobil pro odtah vozidel
Odtahová vozidla
4
Ø2 in industry
Revize elektrických zařízení a hromosvodů dle ČSN 331500, 332000-6, 341390, 62305-3 a revize el. spotřebičů dle ČSN 331600 ed. 2 u obj. KŘP Msk
Elektrické strojní zařízení, přístroje, zařízení a spotřební materiál, osvětlení
9
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

57%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Unicont Opava s.r.o.
1 9,444,533
Beskydgroup s.r.o.
1 5,506,732
East Port Praha, s.r.o.
1 3,234,802
Hcs Centrum s.r.o.
1 2,699,000
Zdeněk Keller
1 2,000,000
Other suppliers 2 1,236,000

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (1 from 0)
Nonprice competition 50% (1 from 2)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 2)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

18%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 34,884,948
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 1,055,429,104
Total 1,090,314,052

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

75%
average 61%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

67%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 33%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

36%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 7)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 29% (2 from 7)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 7)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 7)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 0% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.41 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

93%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 7)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 14% (1 from 7)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 56%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.