Small cities • 2016

Město Šenov

IČO 00297291

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

46%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Kanalizace Šenov sever – rozšíření kanalizační sítě, zhotovitel
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
Vícepráce – ROZŠÍŘENÍ KANALIZACE ŠENOV
Stavební práce
1
Ø5 in industry
Stavební úpravy objektu staré školy Šenov, č.p. 128
Rekonstrukce budov
8
Ø5 in industry
Svoz odpadu pro Město Šenov
Služby související s likvidací odpadů a odpady
2
Ø3 in industry
Nákup zemního plynu na Komoditní burze Praha
Zemní plyn
3
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

59%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Commodum, spol. s r.o.
1 47,512,218
Ozo Ostrava s.r.o.
2 19,686,252
Evt Stavby s.r.o.
3 19,497,230
Kavis, spol. s r.o.
1 9,897,025
Pražská plynárenská, a.s.
1 8,024,687
Other suppliers 4 13,567,571

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

94%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (2 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Division into lots 67% (2 from 3)
E-auction 67% (2 from 3)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 3)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

28%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Vícepráce – ROZŠÍŘENÍ KANALIZACE ŠENOV
Dodatečné práce
- 17,435,327
Nákup zemního plynu na Komoditní burze Praha
Not disclosed
- 8,024,687
Nákup elektrické energie na Komoditní burze Praha
Not disclosed
- 4,738,054
Vícepráce 2 – ROZŠÍŘENÍ KANALIZACE ŠENOV
Dodatečné práce
- 1,059,189
Vícepráce 3 – ROZŠÍŘENÍ KANALIZACE ŠENOV
Dodatečné práce
- 1,002,714

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 20%
Cancelled contracts 20%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

84%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 12)
Final or estimated price not published 42% (5 from 12)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 12)
Missing supplier ID 8% (1 from 12)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 12)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 12)
Missing call for tenders 8% (1 from 12)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 12)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 12)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

81%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 12)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier donating to political party 8% (1 from 12)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 0% (0 from 12)